Tag Archives: bad choice

Miata been a bad idea

10 Mar

miata

Long story short, the two women in the above picture (credit to Reddit user speednub1), saw a car they have a low opinion of and decided to climb inside it and stomp around on the seats in their high heels.

The general population’s reaction to this image has thus far been a resounding “What the fuck?” and the words bitch and crazy have been pointed repeatedly at the women pictured, among other, far less pleasant terms.Clearly there are some people out there who don’t understand why this scenario has inspired uproar, otherwise this picture wouldn’t exist in the first place. So, I’m going to attempt to clarify.What they did wrong

  1. The two women in the picture are intentionally treating someone else’s property poorly, knowing full well that their actions may damage that property.The two women are enjoying their efforts to attempt to damage someone else’s property.The reason these two women are happily attempting to damage someone else’s property because it doesn’t match their personal tastes
  2. .The two women are so ignorant that they fully believe their actions are acceptable. They have intentionally shared the fun they had attempting to damage someone else’s property publicly via social media, complete with easily personally identifiable features.By  proudly noting, at least 12 hours after the incident occurred, that “heels were intact,” they have pointed out that the incident wasn’t a random, alcohol fueled mistake but instead something they do not regret at all a full day later.

Why people are angry

As a society, we’ve agreed on a few thousand rules. We call them laws. They pretty much all come back to the simplest rule of all, known as The Golden Rule. It states: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” It’s a damned simple rule and it’s extremely effective at keeping society functional.

Note that the Golden Rule does not include the clause: “unless you don’t like their taste in cars”; or: “unless you think it will be funny to your friends”; or: “unless you have nice legs and pretty hair”; or: “unless you’re lucky enough to live in a country so wealthy that you feel entitled to judge people based on their financial expenditures”; or any other clauses.

Selfish and self centred

If I had to boil it down, the reason the actions of the two women in the picture is so offensive is because it so unbelievably selfish and self centred. It inspires an immediate reaction of “who the fuck do you think you are?” What they’re doing is openly flouting one of the core concepts of society.

They’re treating someone else like a piece of shit and laughing about it. They’re doing so because they feel entitled to, because they think themselves ‘better’ than someone who would buy a Miata, and for some reason they think they are exempt from the rules we’re all expected to follow. Plus, they’re ‘rubbing it in’ by gloating about it.

We don’t hate them because they’re beautiful, but it sure doesn’t help their cause.

Don’t get me wrong, people would be furious even if these two women weren’t attractive, but the fact that they are just reminds us all that we know attractive young woman already have a head start in life, and knowing that only makes it more offensive when we see them taking advantage of others or ignoring social norms.

How could they have avoided this?

It’s not surprising to learn that there are people out there who think that their opinion is more important than everyone else’s, or that the rules don’t apply to them, or that they’re better than everyone else, or that they don’t respect other people. As much as we might wish that weren’t true, we know all that there are people out there who think that way.

And that’s where the girls in the picture went wrong. They went beyond thinking in a way that the majority of us consider revolting, they acted on it. If they’d just walked past that Miata and commented on how ‘hideous’ it is to them, nothing would have come of it, but they didn’t. They climbed into a stranger’s car and stomped all over the seats in their heels.

That decision between “should I just think about this or should I actually do it” is the difference between being known as “those two cute girls” and “those crazy bitches”.

Crazy bitch tip: You are not more important than anyone else, and you don’t get to damage other people’s things just because you don’t like them.

 

 

Advertisements

But… butt… why the arsehole?

9 Sep

I know I’m getting older and I’m losing touch with what’s cool and what’s not, but…

Asshole tattooSeriously?

If someone come to me and said, “hey I want to make hundreds of tiny painful incisions in your poo chute and leave ink in those holes so that there’ll be a permanent design there”, the only chance they have of getting me to agree to it is by following that up with, “and I’m going to pay you $1,000,000 if you let me do it.” And even then I’m not sure I’d go for it. If I did, I would do so begrudgingly and be keeping it very, very quiet.

So it makes it difficult for me to understand that the girl in that picture went to that tattooist and told him, she’d pay him to do that to her. I actually feel bad for the tattooist because that’s gotta be one of the shittiest jobs he’s ever had to undertake.

And you’ve gotta wonder why anyone would want a tattoo on their clacker. Even if you’re an exhibitionist, it’s not exactly an easy location to see. Frankly, the whole thing is outside of the realm of logic for me, and I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking it’s just a bit too out there to be anything less than cookoo mcgoos.

Hey, at least it’s unique

Y’know, it’s amazing how far people will go to be unique. The Guiness Book of World Records is testament to that. Maybe the woman in the picture above thought she was going to be unique because of her tattooed brown eye. Maybe that was part of why she decided to get it done.

I hope not, because…

and also…

So…

It’s your body, you own it. You can do whatever you want with it. It’s just that some things might seem like a good idea at the time but turn out to be horrible choices down the line. Think about it. As weird as it would be going through the process of getting a tattoo on your rectum, at least tatooists are generally used to weird shit, but if (when) you change your mind and decide to get it removed, you’re going to have to explain to someone that you thought getting an anus tattoo was a great idea back in the day but you’ve changed your mind now and you’d really like lasers shot directly at your bunghole to get rid of it.

It’s your right to make bad choices and trust me, I’ve made a fuckload of them myself, but I’ve never gotten a goddamned butthole tattoo because everyone knows that’s a fucking crazy thing to do.

Crazy bitch tip: You really, really, really, really realllllllllllllllllllly don’t need a tattoo on your arsehole.

Rachel Dolezal

16 Jul

Rachel Dolezal is a weirdo. That’s not a nice thing to say, but it’s unfortunately quite accurate.

WTF?

If you’re not familiar with the story, the short version is that Rachel Dolezal had been claiming to be black traded on that fact to help her get into the position of head of the Spokane chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. That organisation, also known as the NAACP, fights for the rights of people of colour within America, and Ms Dolezal effectively used a modern take on blackface to get a high profile job within the organisation.

How do we know for sure that Ms Dolezal is not black? Her parents told us. Ms Dolezal was born two, ordinary, everyday Caucasian parents of German and Czech origins. There is no denying that Ms Dolezal is as Caucasian as can be.

There’s no denying it

Photos have also given us a pretty solid indication that she miiiiiiiiggggghhhhhtttttt just be white under all that tan and hair trickery. For instance, here’s Rachel Dolezal’s wedding photo:

Rachel Dolezal's wedding photo suggests she is not of African heritage.

Rachel Dolezal’s wedding photo suggests she is not of African heritage.

Ms Dolezal has had a lot of interaction with people of colour throughout her life. For example, her parents adopted some children who happened to be non-Caucasian. She thought of those children as her siblings, but they certainly did not ever think she was black.

According to her siblings, she did not think she was black until 2011

Here’s an example of her adopted brother’s opinion on her behaviour.

And another:

But she was a human rights activist, that’s good no matter how she got there, right?

Bullshit.

Rachel Dolezal’s behaviour is making a mockery of her position of the head of the NAACP chapter in Spokane by bringing ‘being black’ into question. If Ms Dolezal wanted to help people of colour get a better and more equal go of things she could done that just as well without lying about her race.

And now she’s come out with all this rubbish about believing she’s ‘transracial’ and she’s damaging the credibility of both transgender people anyone who might actually have a legit claim to being transracial. There are people out there, for example, who are considered ‘not black enough’ to be black by members of their own race, and that to me would trigger some serious difficulties which could potentially be labeled ‘transracial’ but just being endeared towards another culture does NOT measure up, and claiming that it does is a selfish and manipulative effort for Ms Dolezal to attempt to escape the scrutiny she’s under.

But she’s had the black experience!?

Fuck off with that rubbish.

Ms Dolezal claims to understand the black experience and have a deep, personal connection with being black, except she grew up white in a very white community and has only recently started to modify her appearance to look black. Even if Ms Dolezal has experienced a bit of racism directed towards her, if it all gets too much for her, she could just switch back to looking like a white person. That’s the difference right there, hers is a choice, a decision, a type of tourism.

Montel Williams is spot on here:

A person who is of African heritage cannot just switch out when they feel like the inherent racism they have to deal with is restricting their opportunities in life. They’re stuck with that and have to accept that the system is pretty shit, and that they’ll have to fight to be afforded the same treatment provided to Caucasians… and that’s exactly WHY THE NAACP EXISTS, and then an impersonator gets into the top job of the local chapter and even fucks up the efforts of black people to fight for their rights!

Can’t say I agree with Whoopi on that one. I think Rosie Perez is right on the money.

She’s a liar

Rachel Dolezal was caught out and she’s trying to lie her way out of it. The saddest part is there’s a lot of speculation that it was her divorce that pushed her into some sort of nervous breakdown, at which point she attempted to deal with it by changing who she believed she was.

I’m not judging the woman for having a tough time and that impacting her in a difficult way, but that doesn’t absolve her of the bullshit she’s been spouting since she was caught out.

Transracial issues may be valid or not, but Rachel Dolezal is not a good example. She’s a liar and is only concerned with getting away with being caught out and she’s mangling a whole bunch of bullshit lies together in order to get out of it.

Crazy bitch tip: Stop fucking lying about your reasons for dressing up in black face.

Check the rear view before going out

10 Jul

  
Crazy bitch tip: It’s worth checking a mirror over your shoulder before you go outside. I’m not saying you have to, but not doing so leaves you open to situations like the one above.

Belle Gibson’s interview

5 Jul

This whole thing skeeves me out. I can’t stand the obvious lies being spouted from Ms Gibson but the production and behaviour by the 60 minutes program is just as ridiculous.

You can decide for yourself how much of Belle’s elaborate story you believe, but keep an eye out for the points in the interview when the footage stops, they zoom in and then make the picture all red, somewhat implying that Belle = Satan. That pisses me off because 60 minutes used to be a show with journalistic integrity, but since Fox got its hands on things, it’s turned into a biased, tabloid styled bullshit that no longer has anything to do with genuine journalism.

Any sensible person can see through Belle’s bullshit without all the additional fanfare. Anyway, check out the interview and see what you think of this double sided farce.

Crazy bitch tip: If your lies are discovered and everyone hates you, trying to lie your way out of it is not going to work.

White people are allowed to have opinions

28 May

I missed the first part of this video the first time I watched it, so I was shocked by the actions of the presenter.

Then I watched it again and caught the part where the woman tells the presenter that his opinion is invalid because he’s a white male and suggests that because he’s a white male, he’s automatically racist and sexist. I also noticed that, in the midst of this she tries to talk over the host of the show and then accuses him of talking over her.

At a certain point, there’s just no way to be on her side.

For me it was when she couldn’t handle the criticism the host aimed at her and told him that she wasn’t “going to enact the labour of having to explain” why the hosts criticism of her calling him a racist, sexist purely for being born a white male is offensive to her.

For the record, I know ‘her’ name but I don’t want to direct people in her direction, so I’m going with the generic forms of ‘she’ and ‘her’.

Honestly, I just feel bad for her. I feel bad for the majority of these young social justice warriors, really.

Yes, of course there are wrongs going on in the world and there are people that seek to take advantage of you or are prejudiced against you because you were born female or an ethnicity other than Caucasian, but I think it’s been so brainwashed into these young women that they’re seeing it in situations it doesn’t exist. That wouldn’t be such an issue if it didn’t actually hurt the cause, but it does. It diminishes the impact of the voices of those people who are fighting against actual injustices. It reinforces the opinions of those people who are sexist and racist and it alienates the people who are actually on the good side because they get blamed for things they have nothing to do with.

Anyway, you might as well disregard anything I’ve said on the matter because I’m a white, male and my opinion is apparently racist, sexist and minimalising everyone on the planet. Sorry about that, and sorry about talking over you.

Crazy bitch tip: Maybe you should enact the labour of explaining whatever the fuck is going on in your head so that someone can understand why you’re calling everyone racist sexists.

Update

I found a video in which a guy goes through and accumulates all the various bullshit the young woman in the video has been up to.

But I’ve realised that it’s presented by a white male, so again, it’s clearly completely invalid as well.

Don’t titty-bump old ladies to the ground

5 Mar

A woman who doesn’t have a valid drivers license drove to Walmart and failed miserably to pull into the handicapped spot she was aiming for. She failed so badly that a little old lady thought the spot was free and pulled into it.

The little old lady has a valid handicapped parking permit which she was provided because she recently had a hip replacement surgery. The younger woman did have a handicapped parking permit with her, the thing is, it wasn’t her permit. It sounds like she’d taken someone else’s and was using it on her car.

The younger woman is looking like a pretty shitty human being already, what with driving without a license and using an invalid handicapped permit, but then she went and upped herself right into crazy bitch territory by getting angry at the old lady and “titty bumping” her to the ground.

When the police asked the younger woman about this, she said:

kezia-perkins

“it’s not my fault the elderly woman bounced off my big (chest).”

 

“it’s not my fault the elderly woman bounced off my big (chest).”

We all know she said “titties” instead of (chest), and I’d wager she didn’t actually use the term ‘elderly woman’ either.

The thing about being elderly and having major surgeries is, it makes a frail person even more frail. Generally speaking, it’s a bad idea to go around knocking people to the ground. It’s an even worse idea to go knocking elderly people to the ground. It’s still worse to go around knocking elderly women to the ground, and worse than that is to go around knocking elderly women who are recovering from major surgeries to the ground!

Now, you might have a good reason to knock someone to the ground. Y’know, maybe there’s an eagle trying to catch them as prey and carry them away for some eats, and if so, fair enough, knock that old lady to the ground. If, however, you’re an unlicensed driver trying to park your car in a spot you don’t have the right to be in and they take that spot because they’re struggling to get around on account of being old and recovering from surgery, well, you’re being pretty unreasonable. The best course of action if you’re already in the wrong is definitely not to make the situation worse, and by throwing your angry titties at an old lady to smash her to the ground, well, that’s not going to make the situation better.

The elderly woman in this scenario is now recovering from having spent quite some time on the ground in the snow after her hip surgery came undone. She has since had another hip surgery and is, yet again, suffering through the recovery process of that.

(You can stop watching at [2:30] into the video, I don’t know why they’ve added the Beatles stuff after the report.)

Crazy bitch tip: never titty bump old ladies to the ground.

%d bloggers like this: